Sealing ability of two bioceramic sealers used in combination with three obturation techniques


https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2022.14.26
Vol. 14 No. 3 (2022)
Published: 1 September 2022
Endodontic cements, Bioceramics, Obturation techniques, Warm gutta-percha techniques, Cold gutta-percha techniques
Abstract Views: 581
pdf: 681
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • D. I. K. Pontoriero Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena - Department of Endodontics, University of Genoa, Italy.
  • E. Ferrari Cagidiaco Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Italy.
  • F. Cardinali Private Practitioner, Ancona, Italy.
  • R. Fornara Private Practitioner, Milan, Italy.
  • M. Amato Department of Endodontics, University of Salerno, Italy.
  • S. Grandini Department of Endodontics, University of Siena, Italy.
  • M. Ferrari Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Italy.

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of two bioceramic endodontic sealers when used in combination with three different obturation techniques. 

Materials and methods A sample of 100 recently extracted intact human single-rooted anterior teeth was included in the study. After the instrumentation phase, the teeth were randomly divided into five groups and filled with different techniques and materials. Group 1 (n=20) was filled using Thermafil® obturators (Dentsply/Maillefer) with BioRoot™ RCS (Septodont); Group 2 (n=20) was filled using a single GP cone with BioRoot™ RCS (Septodont) bioceramic sealer; Group 3 (n=20) was filled using warm vertical condensation with BioRoot™ RCS (Septodont) bioceramic sealer; Group 4 (n=20) was filled using warm vertical condensation with CeraSeal (Meta Biomed) bioceramic sealer; Group 5 (n=20) was filled with carrier-based obturation (Thermafil®, Dentsply/Maillefer) with CeraSeal (Meta Biomed) bioceramic sealer. Apical leakage was evaluated and statistical analysis was applied (Bonferroni and ANOVA tests) with the significance level set at P <0.05. 

Results All groups showed a low amount of apical leakage, without statistically significant differences. 

Conclusions Under in vitro conditions, the two bioceramic endodontic sealers used in combination with the obturation techniques used, both warm and cold gutta-percha, can similarly seal the root apex.


Pontoriero, D. I. K., Ferrari Cagidiaco, E., Cardinali, F., Fornara, R., Amato, M., Grandini, S., & Ferrari, M. (2022). Sealing ability of two bioceramic sealers used in combination with three obturation techniques. Journal of Osseointegration, 14(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2022.14.26

Copyright (c) 2022 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Osseointegration has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.