Evaluation of marginal bone loss around SLActive implants by CBCT using different implant dimensions and surgical approaches: a clinical and radiological prospective study

Submitted: 8 January 2021
Accepted: 22 March 2021
Published: 18 October 2021
Abstract Views: 1000
pdf: 346
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Aim The reduction in the amount of marginal bone is the most important demand for the long term success of  dental implants. This prospective clinical study was aimed to investigate the marginal bone loss of early loaded SLActive implants with different dimensions and surgical approaches. 

Materials and methods Fifteen patients aged from 18 to 60 years were divided into 2 groups (flapped and flapless approach) that underwent delayed implant placement protocol with SLActive implants. The marginal bone level was estimated by cone-beam computed tomography during three different periods: preoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery and 24 weeks after loading of the prosthesis. 

Results The mean value of marginal bone level was not significantly changed 8 weeks after surgery and 12 weeks after loading of the prosthesis when compared with baseline data in both flapped and flapless approach. Bone level was significantly decreased with dental implant dimension Ø 4.1 mm RC, length 12 mm. 

Conclusion The results demonstrated that  marginal bone loss is affected by many factors, such as age of the patient, and dental implant dimension.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Almayah, H., Hassan, T. A. ., Al-Jumaily, H. A. ., & Al-Ghurabi, Z. H. . (2021). Evaluation of marginal bone loss around SLActive implants by CBCT using different implant dimensions and surgical approaches: a clinical and radiological prospective study. Journal of Osseointegration, 14(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.14.1