Analysis in vitro of the insertion torque of hybrid tapered implants with different types of instrumentation and two clinical cases report


Submitted: 9 August 2018
Accepted: 21 October 2018
Published: 14 June 2019
Abstract views:
1472


pdf:
413
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • G. Thomé Department of Implantology, Latin American Institute for Research and Dental Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.
  • S. Pires Department of Implantology, Latin American Institute for Research and Dental Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.
  • R. Salatti Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.
  • C. A. Cartelli Department of Implantology, Latin American Institute for Research and Dental Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.
  • M. B. de Moura Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brazil.
  • L. C. Trojan Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Brazil, Brazil.

Aim The aim of this study was to observe the behavior of the hybrid implants, evaluating the insertion test with different drilling protocols and present two case reports of hybrid implant placed in the upper arch.

Materials and methods For the in vitro study 50 implants were placed in 2 different types of synthetic bone blocks composed of rigid solid polyurethane (high density, type I, and low density, type IV). The implants were divided into five groups (n=10): Group 1 (Test) hybrid/conical implants of 3.75 mm x 13 mm placed in a high density bone block with oversized instrumentation; Group 2 (Control) cutting/cylindrical of 3.75 mm x 13 mm, placed in a high density bone block with regular instrumentation; Group 3 (Test) hybrid/conical implants of 4.3 mm x 13 mm placed in a low density bone block with undersized instrumentation; Group 4 (Test) hybrid/conical implants of 4.3 mm x 13 mm placed in a low density bone block with regular instrumentation; Group 5 (Control) compact/conical implants of 4.3 mm x 13 mm  placed in a low density bone block with regular instrumentation. Two cases are reported of hybrid implants placed in the maxilla with 12-month follow up.

Results No significant difference was observed between hybrid/conical implants and the control group, according to final placement torque in high and low density bone. However, undersized instrumentation showed a significantly increased final torque placement for hybrid/conical implant.

Conclusions Implant macrostructure, bone instrumentation technique influence the insertion torque for hybrid/conical implants. At the 12-month follow-up the implants were stable.


Thomé, G., Pires, S., Salatti, R., Cartelli, C. A., de Moura, M. B., & Trojan, L. C. (2019). Analysis in vitro of the insertion torque of hybrid tapered implants with different types of instrumentation and two clinical cases report. Journal of Osseointegration, 11(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.02.04

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations