Literature on the accuracy of guided surgery for dental implants: A scoping review


https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.5
Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021)
Published: 21 September 2021
Dentistry, Dental Implants , Oral Surgery , Prosthodontics
Abstract Views: 563
pdf: 961
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • M. N. Gerhardt
    mauricio_gerhardt@hotmail.com
    Research Group Prosthodontics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil - OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven and Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven,, Belgium. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-9123
  • K. B. Kreuzer Research Group Prosthodontics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • R. S. A. Shinkai Research Group Prosthodontics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil - Professor at School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Aim To summarise data available in the PubMed database regarding the accuracy of dental implants placed by means of static and navigated guided surgery.

Methods A search strategy was performed in order to find eligible articles in English reporting the accuracy of dental implants placed in humans with guided surgery techniques.

Results The search resulted in 387 articles for screening. After the selection, 44 articles were included for data extraction. 22 articles reported the accuracy of static guided surgery with mucosa-supported guides, 20 with tooth-supported, 3 with bone-supported and 7 with dynamic guided surgery.

Conclusions All studies with Static Guided Surgery and Dynamic Guided Surgery included in this review present deviations within the clinical accepted limits and represent excellent alternatives for guided implant placement.


Gerhardt, M. N., Kreuzer, K. B., & Shinkai, R. S. A. (2021). Literature on the accuracy of guided surgery for dental implants: A scoping review. Journal of Osseointegration, 13(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.5

Copyright (c) 2021 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Osseointegration has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.