In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate molar crowns with different occlusal thickness
Aim: To compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal thickness.
Materials and methods: Thirty CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with different occlusal thickness were randomly distributed into 3 experimental groups: 0.5 mm (group 1), 1.0 mm (group 2) and 1.5 mm (group 3). The restorations were cemented onto human molars with a self-adhesive resin cement. The specimens were loaded until fracture; the fracture resistance and mode of failure were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with the one-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher’s Exact test with Bonferroni’s correction (p=0.05).
Results: The fracture resistance values of all the specimens exceeded the maximum physiological occlusal loads in molar regions. The highest fracture resistance was noticed in 1.0 mm-thick crowns. Ultrathin restorations (group 1) proved to be statistically less resistant to fracture than those of the other experimental groups (p<0.05). The crowns were mainly interested by unrestorable fractures.
Conclusions: The occlusal thickness of CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns influences either the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of the restorations; the occlusal thickness of such restorations can be reduced up to a lower bound of 1.0 mm in order to keep sufficient strength to withstand occlusal loads; CAD-CAM monolithic lithium disilicate crowns showed sufficient fracture resistance to be used in molar regions but not in an ultrathin configuration (0.5 mm).
PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.